The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

In light of the records, the court below is just in maintaining the judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the changed facts charged of this case on the ground that there is no proof of crime, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules.

In addition, the part of the judgment of the court below, which was pointed out by the prosecutor, "the damaged property, the structure intrusion building (the changed name property damage building and the structure intrusion building)" in the case indication of the court below, is obvious to have erroneously stated "the damaged property and the structure intrusion", and the court below has already made a decision to correct it as of July 14, 2017, and thus

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.