1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

A. On October 28, 2013, the Daejeon Metropolitan City Mayor announced a public announcement of the designation as a Bogeumjari Housing District of Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, a public announcement of the said public announcement to implement the Bogeumjari Housing Project (hereinafter “instant project”). The Daejeon-gu D land (hereinafter “instant land”) was incorporated into the project district of the instant project.

B. The Plaintiff, as a lessee of the instant land-based detached housing (hereinafter “instant housing”), was engaged in door-to-door sales business under the name of “E” on the location of the said housing.

C. On June 20, 2014, the Daejeon Metropolitan City Mayor consulted with the Plaintiff on expropriation of obstacles and business compensation, but no agreement was reached, filed an application for adjudication with the Central Land Expropriation Committee on June 20, 2014. On November 20, 2014, the Central Land Expropriation Committee accepted obstacles (signboards and number) owned by the Plaintiff located in the instant land in KRW 875,000, and rendered a ruling that the Plaintiff’s business compensation claim is rejected.

(hereinafter “instant acceptance ruling”) D.

The Plaintiff filed an objection against the adjudication of acceptance of the instant case, but the Central Land Tribunal rendered a ruling dismissing the Plaintiff’s objection on October 22, 2015.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant objection”). 【No dispute exists concerning the grounds for recognition / [the grounds for recognition], Gap evidence 1-2, 3, Gap evidence 8-1, 2, and Eul evidence 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the business was discontinued due to the execution of the business in this case, and the business place was changed to F of the Daejeon Jung-gu and suffered loss. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff a business compensation of KRW 10 million and delay damages.

B. Article 77(1) of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”) intends to discontinue or suspend business.