logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.01.14 2014고정1548
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who became aware of the fact that the victim C (the age of 55) was the father of the Defendant and the person interested in the bad will, had the victim known, and had the victim known of the fact that he was not the father of the Defendant, had the victim in mind to open to the public, and had 50 residents of the apartment in front of the F apartment living in Seodaemun-gu Seoul around April 11, 2014, with approximately 50 apartments in front of the victim living in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Seoul, the Defendant sound that “the victim “I will have the panty flick, the family destruction, the divorce, and the divorce flick flick flick,” and that “I will have the panty flick flick flick flick flick.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Testimony of a witness C, G and H;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the I Statement;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant argued that the Defendant’s argument in the apartment complex constitutes an act of not violating the social rules after having known the victim and the Defendant’s attachment relationship. However, according to the C, G, and H’s statement, the Defendant used the victim as “influence” while she was under the influence of neighboring residents in the apartment complex, and used the victim as “influence and family destruction crime,” but there was no talk that “influence”, “influences”, “influences”, and “influences”, “influences” and “influences”, she will defluent the victim with fluent and fluent pan influent fluent fluent flus by fluening the clothes, while she was under the influence of neighboring residents.

arrow