1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

The reasoning of the court's explanation in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the theory of conclusion), which is the same as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the theory of conclusion) which is either added or added as follows, thereby citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article

Of the reasons for the decision of the first instance court, the following shall be added to the last part of the reasons for the decision of the first instance (second paragraph 4):

“A site” on the certificate of No. 1 (including a paper number, each construction machinery rental contract). However, even in the case where a person who raised the certificate that the party concerned is a site does not prove its establishment in particular, the court may recognize its establishment by free evaluation without any other evidence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 92Da12070, Apr. 13, 1993). In light of the contents and methods of each of the above confirmation contracts, it appears that it was confirmed by the Defendant’s employees on each working day on the equipment provided by the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff prepared the detailed statement of each transaction (Evidence No. 2) based on each of the above confirmation contracts and appears to have issued each tax invoice (Evidence No. 4) to the Defendant, the court can sufficiently recognize the authenticity of the evidence No. 1.

[] Article 2-b of the reasoning of the first instance judgment.

The following shall be added to paragraph (2)(paragraph 11).

“In addition, the Defendant asserts that the sum of KRW 20,00,000 deposited in the Plaintiff’s account at S’s request (i.e., the sum of KRW 1,200,000) and KRW 29,90,000,00 for the fee for the use of on-site equipment of a limited liability company directly paid to the Plaintiff (i.e., the sum of KRW 3 or 6 below) paid to the Plaintiff, and that the said amount should be deducted from the claimed amount. The Defendant asserts that the sum of KRW 49,90,000 for the fee for the use of on-site equipment of a limited liability company, which was paid to the Plaintiff, has already been paid to the Plaintiff as follows. The amount from the No. Serial date (