logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.03.26 2013고단609
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From March 2012, the Defendant, while working in C Co., Ltd., a motor vehicle dealer, had his/her name and poor persons known through the Internet search of those who were demanded to submit a university graduation certificate and a grade certificate, forged a graduation certificate and a grade certificate, and had them submitted it to the said company.

2. Criminal facts;

A. On March 1, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime of forging official documents by phoneing to a deceased person on his/her name known to him/her through Internet search at a non-permanent place on the Internet and informing him/her of his/her personal information, including his/her name, and at the same time, he/she receives 1.5 million won from the Defendant and “Name A: E, resident registration number, department E, F, date of graduation: February 15, 1995: G, and the above fact: “Name A, date of graduation: March 16, 2012; H: H: date of birth: F, date of admission: Date of graduation: February 2, 1991; date of graduation; date of graduation; and date of graduation; and date of issuance of his/her academic records to the Defendant on February 15, 195; and date of issuance of his/her academic records to the Defendant on February 16, 192.”

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the name-free persons, forged a certificate of graduation to the defendant in the name of the president of the D University, who is an official document, for the purpose of exercising the right.

B. On March 19, 2012, the Defendant submitted at the office of the C Co., Ltd. located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul, one copy of a false graduation certificate and one copy of a false academic certificate at the same time.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised forged official documents.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow