Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a period of six months for violating the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without Permission in the Daegu District Court Port Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 17, 2012.

C is the nominal owner of D’s franchise, E is the actual management owner of the above company, F is the representative director of the above company, G is the investment adviser of the above company, and the defendant is the Posium of the above company.

No one shall conduct an act of receiving money without obtaining authorization or permission, or making registration or report pursuant to other Acts and subordinate statutes, under which many and unspecified persons agree to pay the total amount of money invested or an amount in excess thereof in the future.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with E, F, C, G, etc. on April 3, 2010, recommended investment in the 8th floor D office of the H building in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, that “if one million won per unit is invested, the Defendant shall open a franchise and operate it as an investment fund, and distribute the profit therefrom, one million won per annum, five hundred and twenty thousand won per week, five hundred and twenty thousand won per annum, and one million and two hundred and twenty thousand won per month, shall be paid every two months,” and received an investment of nine million won per day from I to June 11, 2010 by the same method, including importing nine million won from March 22, 2010 to June 1, 2010.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each police statement concerning I, J, K, and L;

1. An investigation report (report accompanied by branch offices of ports and payment details related to A in the details of transactions of D corporate accounts);

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: The application of an inquiry report on criminal records, etc., a report on results of confirmation of the previous disposition (184 pages of investigation records), an investigation report (report attached to a copy of indictment of the same criminal record as a suspect A) and statutes;

1. Article 6 (1) and Article 6 of the Act on the Regulation of Conducting of elective Receipt of Criminal Proceeds and the Punishment without Permission;