All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant is too unreasonable because of the fact that the sentence of the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the sentence of the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The fact that the decision-making defendant recognized his mistake and reflected against the defendant, and that the defendant agreed with the victim D and F is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant's repeated crime of this case and did not agree with the victim H is an unfavorable condition against the defendant, even though the defendant was punished twice by a fine due to his/her repeated driving during the period of repeated crime.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances before and after committing a crime, it is difficult to deem that the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.