Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not an attorney-at-law who operates a company in the United States.

No one, other than an attorney-at-law, shall handle or arrange appraisal, representation, arbitration, reconciliation, solicitation, legal consultation or other legal affairs in connection with cases of litigation, non-litigation, etc. in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits.

Nevertheless, around February 20, 2012, the Defendant dealt with legal affairs, such as the withdrawal of the said litigation through negotiations with the said E company, with respect to civil litigation between the (State) representative EF and the said D representative G at the office of Seoul, Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and with respect to the trade of the said litigation and D shares, and the negotiations with the said E company.

3. 8. Around August, 2008, the said G promised to receive a total of KRW 600 million in return for handling the said legal affairs.

Accordingly, the defendant, not a lawyer, promised to receive money and valuables and dealt with legal affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G and F;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. The Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012 Gohap 529038

1. Proxy letter, written agreement, or written confirmation;

1. A certificate for all registered matters;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to search cases in the 2011 Ghana 349061

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense and subparagraph 1 of Article 109 of the Act (Selection of Penalty) by an attorney at the option of a punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Details of the assertion;

A. A lawsuit concerning the validity of the above cooperation contract and the distribution of profits among D (hereinafter “D”) and E (E (hereinafter “E”) in cooperative relations for the use of the electronic passport sign and the radar domesticization business (hereinafter “electronic passport business of this case”).