The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The plaintiff completed gold production, repair, and processing including the amount traded at the present or in the future (after delay) against D's defendant, based on the executory exemplification of notarial deeds with a face value of KRW 200,000,000,000 prepared by C as an executory document No. 655 of 2019 by a notary public, and applied for the attachment and assignment order of the amount of money until it reaches KRW 200,315,80 of the claim amount among the claim for the cost of goods (hereinafter "the claim for the cost of goods in this case"), and the Suwon District Court issued the attachment and assignment order of the claim (hereinafter "the assignment order in this case"), upon accepting the above application on December 20, 2019, the assignment order among them was "the attachment and assignment order in this case").

The instant claim attachment and assignment order was served on December 24, 2019 to the Defendant, the garnishee, and on January 2, 2020 to D, each of which was served on the debtor, and confirmed on January 10, 2020.

[Grounds for recognition] According to the above facts-finding, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1, and Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the entire pleadings, the assertion of the cause of claim, and the above facts-finding, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff, a creditor of full-time deposit, the full-time payment amount of KRW 200,315,800 and delay damages.

On December 24, 2019, the claim amount of the goods of this case as of December 24, 2019, which was served on the Defendant’s assertion on the invalidity of the assignment order by the Defendant’s assertion that the assignment order of this case was invalid, is KRW 198,00,00 [The claim amount of the goods of this case = 180,000,000 won (IK remainder 74,400,000 won) upon the request of the owner of the order for the alteration of the design, and the correction and repair of the penalty would be called as “the cost of alteration of the design,” and if the penalty was modified according to the Defendant’s own judgment, the cost therefrom would be called as “the cost of alteration of the design,” and the cost of alteration

Value-added 18,00,000 won of value-added 105,600,000, and hereinafter referred to as "value-added 18,000 won of goods."