Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. In the 15:00 on October 14, 2015, the Defendant’s insultd the Defendant: (a) complained against the Defendant’s complaint that was not designated as soon as the date for the trial on civil action; (b) mixed the hump to D, a legal officer in charge of the public interest, with the humbing and huming the humb; and (c) the victim E, a legal officer in charge of the public interest, “I am humbly, I am humbly, and I am humbly, I am humbly, and I am hum.

The term “the Defendant” refers to the 7-8 staff members and the 3-4 civil petitioners in a place where the Defendant was removed, and “I will not see why I will do so, but he will do so, and he will do so in a way that I will do so, and she will do swelve in a way that there is a swelve.

Nor, from the beginning, the light was inside the mind.

In anywhere, they are frightening. A person who lives in a frighted and frightened, and frightened with a large sound, anywhere he or she would be frighten and frighten.

On October 14, 2015, the Defendant, at around 15:50, and around 15:50 on the ground that the victim reported to the police, “If you reported to the police, the police is called out, and if you report to the police, the police is out of the country, she is out of the country, she shall grow, she shall she shall she, and she shall cut, she shall she is, and she shall she is, she is, she is, she is, and she is, she is, she is, without wrapping anywhere.”

Accordingly, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim.

2. On October 14, 2015, around 15:50 around October 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) took care of the public interest law officials affiliated with the Ministry of Justice, who are dispatched to C, on the ground that he reported to the police as above by the public interest law officials affiliated with the Ministry of Justice, and took a bath; (b) assaulted the cans and coffee used to put them on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning civil petition affairs by the public interest law officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Filing an investigation report (the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of processing reported cases);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;