1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B (the age of 38) were divorced from October 5, 2016 after marriage in 2003.

1. On September 15, 2016, around 02:45, the Defendant: (a) destroyed a special material damage on the street in front of the Central Park Park Park 10 (Mobburg8) (Moburg 10) (Moburg 10) (Moburg 10) (Moburg 10) (Moburg 8) (a dangerous object without any special reason; (b) destroyed the left-hand side of the Dless-Pacific Motor Vehicle, which is the victim B, parked on the road in the front ender; and (c) destroyed the car by the shock of the car, which is the victim E-owned in front of the car; and (d) destroyed the FFC, which is the victim E-owned in front of the car, by using stones, which is a dangerous object.

2. The Defendant, at the time and time set forth in the above paragraph 1, was in mind of having a fire in the victim B, at the place of the victim B, with a capacity of 20 litres, distributed light oil in loading a Dunch- traffic vehicle with a capacity of 20 litress, and was loaded in the said vehicle by attaching a fire to the container in advance, but did not move the vehicle to the vehicle and did not commit an attempted crime.

3. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the time and time set forth in paragraph (1) of the same Article, the Defendant driven a CRano five-ton general dump vehicle with approximately 5m alcohol content 0.160% under the influence of alcohol in the 8th street of Samsung C, Samsung C, which is located in the Central Park Don-ro 10th of the Central Park Don-ro.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement of E and G;

1. Each internal investigation report, each investigation report, each notification of the results of the regulation of drunk driving, notification of the influence of alcohol driving, the statement of the influence of alcohol driving, and the inquiry into the records of the control of drunk driving (a defendant asserts that there is no fact that a drunk driving was conducted, but the above evidence can be acknowledged in full view of the facts that a drunk driving was conducted. Thus, the judgment in the judgment is proved

1. Criminal facts;