A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 30, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on November 30, 2007. On January 21, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On January 28, 201, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3.5 million from the Gwangju District Court’s net support on January 28, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

On December 2, 2019, at around 15:05, the Defendant driven an E-Poter cargo vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance in the state of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.169% from the distance of about 1k from the front of the C cafeteria located in the Donnam-gun B to the front of the D Donnam-gun.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. The rental of cars (E), the mandatory insurance policy (E);

1. Previous convictions as indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, investigation reports (verification of previous convictions of the same type), and summary orders in four copies of summary orders, which include summary orders (49 to 50 pages of investigation records) in the case of violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) by the head of the Gwangju District Court for the interest of the head of the Gwangju District Court. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes shall be excluded;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment (the point of driving, the choice of imprisonment), Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (the point of operating an insurance vehicle, the choice

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order of Education and the Order of Community Service has already been punished four times or more, but it again led to the instant crime.

At the time of the instant crime, the blood alcohol concentration is very high.

However, the defendant is guilty of his mistake and commits the crime of this case.