logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.08.09 2017고단1616
사문서위조등
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the vice president of C (Representative D) corporation running real estate development and sales agency business, and the defendant A is the employee of the above company.

Defendant

B During the process of performing services upon the request of H, which is the implementer of the new apartment construction project of the Cheongju-si E-Gu Housing Association, the chairman of the housing association promotion committee, the representative director of the G representative director company, G representative director of the apartment construction project, B prepared a draft service contract between the above F Housing Association promotion committee and C, and presented it to the above H, and completed two copies of the draft service contract with the above H in reviewing the contents of the contract with the above H, while examining the contents of the contract with the above H., however, due to the difference between H and the service costs, one copy of the draft service contract was kept in the form of each of the above H and the service costs without affixing the seal within the draft of the PE service contract, and then the service costs was carried out.

On June 26, 2015, K Co., Ltd. transferred all of the above business rights to K Co., Ltd. on the ground that it is difficult to implement the project because it did not obtain the landowner’s consent to use the land more than 80% of the project site from the landowner, and due to this, C Co., Ltd has lost its status as a PM service company and could not claim the cost of PM services to the Housing Association Promotion Committee.

Accordingly, the Defendants, who completed the completion of the MF service contract up to February 27, 2015, conspired to use it as a claim for the service cost after arbitrarily finishing the above seal on the two draft of the PE service contract.

A. On July 3, 2015, the Defendants jointly committed the crime of forging private documents and uttering of the above investigation document (1) The Defendants forged private documents at the office of the F Housing Association Promotion Committee located in the Cheongju-gu jurisdiction over the Cheongju-si on July 3, 2015, and Defendant A required the seal of the chairman of the F Housing Association Promotion Committee for document supplementation work, and the said seal was issued by K, which is an employee of the said association, set forth two copies of the draft of the above PM service contract.

arrow