(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.16 2017고단8602

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.16 2017고단8602

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 22, 2017, around 06:25, the Defendant was driving a four-lane 4-lane along the intersection in front of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government enzym, Seocho-gu, the Seocho-gu, the Seocho-gu, the Seocho-gu, as his duties, along the fourth-lane in the direction of the distance of the terminal from the shooting distance of the non-developed apartment.

Since there is a signal apparatus and crosswalk installed, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk and prevent the accident by safely driving it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant found out the victim F (n, 61 years old) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals from the left side of the direction of the course by the occupational negligence, in which the signal of the front intersection was red, and operated late on the left side of the direction of the course, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor. However, the Defendant reported the said car that intruded on the crosswalk, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor.

Ultimately, the Defendant got beyond the victim as above due to the above occupational negligence, and suffered approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment from the victim to the left-hand part of the satisfaction that requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant on the third public trial date;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of selective fine for punishment (the fact that there are extenuating circumstances in relation to the details of the crime, the first offender, and the fact that motor vehicle comprehensive insurance has been subscribed, etc.);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.

참조조문

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 2018.05.17 2018고단182

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.03.16 2016고정142

-서울북부지방법원 2021.02.16 2020고단2906

-서울서부지방법원 2017.03.16 2016고단2727

-서울남부지방법원 2016.06.30 2016고정1140