The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Defendant A is a pc employee, and the victim B is a taxi driver of the C Company.

At around 08:20 on November 04, 2012, the Defendant: (a) 08:20, the 103-dong Do-ro, the Do-si, the Do-si, the Do-si, was boarding a taxi operated by the Plaintiff B, a taxi driver, and was unable to pay the arrival fee to the destination; (b) on the ground that the victim promptly brought the fare to the destination, the Defendant she dumpeded the dub, and dumddddd the inner part into the hand floor

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim B submitted a written agreement on June 19, 2013, which was after the institution of the instant indictment, stating that the victim B would not wish to punish the defendant. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.