logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2014.08.27 2014고단562
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On May 3, 2014, at around 02:40 on May 3, 2014, the Defendant driven an E Car with blood alcohol content of 0.272% under the influence of alcohol from approximately 1km to the intersection of the front private distance of 487 Won-ro, Namwon Fire Fighting Station located in the original city level.

B. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car with the E Car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Risk Driving).

The Defendant, like in the preceding paragraph, was in inaccurate with alcohol content of 0.272% at the same time, and the Defendant was driving the said car at a 487 nuclear fire fighting station at the south of the prime city at the prime city, with a view to making it difficult for the Defendant to drive the car normally due to influence within one meter, such as snicking within one meter, and snicking, and driving the said car at a snick speed from the side of the prime city to the modern apartment.

The location is a private-distance intersection where traffic is controlled by a red on-and-off signal, and at the same time, the victim B(31 years of age) was driving a Fbenz 300 car on the left side and driving it toward interesting from the distance of medical center. In such a case, there was a duty of care to temporarily stop the car that was in progress to the driver of the vehicle, and to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system by properly operating the steering direction.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in proceeding with the said car rental car as it was, and the front part of the said car rental car was the front part of the said victim’s car.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a cage cage cage cage, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

2. Defendant B

A. The defendant is in violation of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow