logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.12.24 2014나43924
구상금
Text

1. The part of the creditor subrogation claim in the lawsuit of this case, which is changed in exchange at the trial, shall be dismissed;

2.In the trial, the trial shall be held.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company running an electronic payment agency business on behalf of a credit card holder, etc. for a person who sells goods or provides services under a contract with a credit card company in the course of electronic commerce transaction. 2) The Plaintiff drafted a special agreement with the Hyundai Card Company on a member store of an electronic commerce settlement agency with the following contents:

Special terms of merchant agreements with other credit card companies are almost the same in addition to the order of the provisions.

Article 3 (Scope of Application) The scope of this Special Agreement is limited to a card holder (including a union member) where a member subject to sale A (including a union member), and the goods subject to sale are goods or services sold in the Internet shopping mall operated by a shop occupant company in B (Plaintiff).

Article 6 (Cancellation of Transactions) (1) If a member makes a request for the cancellation of a request for the goods purchased (hereinafter referred to as "electronic shopping mall") from a shop occupant enterprise (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff") in B, and if the member makes a request for the cancellation of a request, he/she shall immediately forward the goods to the designated account requested by A (on-site Card Co., Ltd.) in order to process the cancellation without delay.

Article 8 (Claim and Payment for Credit Sales Price) (1) A (Plaintiff) confirms whether goods or services purchased by a member are supplied without any abnormal condition, through a certificate of delivery of goods, etc. and then claims the amount of credit sales according to the method (EDI, etc.) determined by mutual consultation between A and B (Plaintiffs).

Article 9 (Return by Doing) In any of the following cases, A (O-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S

arrow