logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.01.19 2013가합106084
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim filed against the Defendants by subrogation of D is dismissed.

2. Defendant.

Reasons

1. The facts of recognition are as follows: Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3-1, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 7-1, 2, 3, 8-1, 2, 3, Gap evidence Nos. 9, 10, 11, and Gap evidence Nos. 12-1 through 4 (the defendants dispute over the authenticity of Gap evidence Nos. 9, 10, 11 and evidence Nos. 12-1, 2, and 3, and each of the above documents contains the names of Eul which are acknowledged to be the pen of Eul by the result of the written appraisal of this Court, and the authenticity of each document is presumed to be completed in whole), and Eul evidence Nos. 6-1, 2, 8-2, and the purport of the whole arguments and arguments as follows.

D asks Defendant C, who had been aware of 10 years prior to 2012, whether it is possible to enable it to acquire the Singapore nationality and to be issued the passport.

Defendant C asked the Defendant B, one’s own seat, and told D that “it is possible for Defendant B to process it, and at the expense, it is necessary to indicate only the unit of USD 100,000 (hereinafter “US”).”

B. D knew the above facts to the Plaintiff, who was known to the general public, and demanded D to pay USD 100,000 to the Plaintiff.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff remitted KRW 50,000,000 on July 19, 2012, and KRW 7,000,000 on July 20, 2012, to Defendant C’s deposit account notified by Defendant C, and subsequently, remitted KRW 56,00,000 on October 24, 2012.

C. On November 14, 2012, November 16, 2012, November 2016, 2012, November 26, 2012, November 26, 2012, and December 10, 2012, Defendant C sent e-mails to D and knew the process of handling the issue of the acquisition and issuance of Singapore. The content is that “Defendant B handles D’s issue of the acquisition of nationality and the issue of issuance with the help of a person E”, and “Defendant B is proceeding on December 4, 1954.” The pertinent department is audit for Singapore department, and it is more likely that D’s issue of identification is proceeding.

The amount of investment of USD 5,00,000.

arrow