Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, with respect to Defendant A, the same shall apply for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, who is engaged in the cooking construction in Mongolia, decided to engage in the clothing trade business with the victim B(45 years) and the same business, invested USD 10,000, and requested the return of the investment amount to the victim because the project was not properly conducted.

Defendant

At around 18:00 on December 11, 2014, A talked about the issue of the return of investment funds with the victim in the car page "D" located in the Tran C, the victim's face was taken once a week as a result of mutual dispute, and the head of a Si/Gun/Gu crogate, which is a dangerous object of breaking the beer residues on the table, put the victim into the inner part of the treatment days, and put the victim into the inner part of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Complaint;

1. Emergency treatment records;

1. B Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the images of the wife

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (the following sentencing shall be considered in consideration of the conditions favorable to the attention) of the mitigated amount;

1. In view of the fact that the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the sentencing of the following has been repeated in favorable conditions), which is a dangerous object for the reason of sentencing, has inflicted an injury on the victim, the crime is not good, but it is judged as ordered in light of all the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that the dispute over the return of the investment deposit resulted in an contingent dispute, the agreement with the victim, and the fact that one's mistake is divided.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the victim A, who is engaged in the cooking construction business in Mongolia, engaged in the clothing trade business with Defendant B and the same business, invested USD 10,000 and requested Defendant B to return the investment amount due to the failure of the business.

Defendant

B On December 11, 2014, 18:00, the victim and the investment shall be returned from the Kaf, "D" of the Mon C AW.