logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고단557
업무방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 20, 2017, from around 06:40 to 08:20 on the same day, the Defendant expressed the victim’s “D cafeteria” operated by the victim C in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around 06:0 to around 08:20 on January 20, 2017, that “I am going to the same year as the year during which I am selling this Chewing,” without any justifiable reason while under the influence of alcohol, I am to the victim, and am to the above restaurant. I am home from the police officer dispatched to the scene with the victim’s report, and am to the above restaurant, and then, I am to the 09:00 on the same day, and am to the drinking house and the restaurant entrance, and interfered with the victim’s business by force by going to undergo the disturbance while going to the public.

Around 07:00 on February 16, 2017, the Defendant found the victim C in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was operated by the victim, and the victim E was able to operate, and found in the "D cafeteria" restaurant where the victim was ordered to provide alcohol, but the victim was refused to do so. As the victim was the victim, the Defendant purchased the plaintiff 1 Byung at the nearby place, and then purchased the plaintiff 1 Byung at the above restaurant, and then sought a demand for a request for a difference from the above E during the said restaurant during the said restaurant, and the victim and E “I will have gone after the test that was made since dwar.”

6.2: (a) the Defendant was forced to go through a large period of time, including, but not limited to, the Defendant’s restaurant business. (b) The Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 557]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. 112 Reporting table (2017 high group 1791);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. 112 Application of the details of processing of reported cases, and statutes on investigation reports (to hear statements by victim C telephone);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Order of community service;

arrow