logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.07 2015가합549347
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim for KRW 1,001,395,769 and damages for delay against the defendant Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the party 1) The Plaintiff is the nine A Apartment-dong 457 households located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(C) The Housing Redevelopment Development and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the “instant partnership”) is organized by the occupants to manage the partnership.

(2) A project proprietor who constructed and sold the instant apartment, is a company that performed the construction of the instant apartment after being awarded a contract for the new construction of the instant apartment, and the Defendant Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) guarantees the duty of repairing the defects of the instant apartment.

B. On April 6, 2011, Defendant Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd. entered into each of the instant apartment contracts (hereinafter “each of the instant guarantee contracts”) with the head of Seongdong-gu having the guarantee creditor as to the instant apartment between the Defendant Corporation and the head of Seongdong-gu, and entered into each of the instant warranty contracts (hereinafter “each of the instant warranty contracts”) as indicated in the following table. Upon obtaining a written warranty contract from the Defendant Corporation, the said contract was deposited with

Since then, the guarantee creditor of each guarantee contract of this case was changed to the plaintiff.

The guarantee number guarantee guarantee period (unit: unit) 1 D 1D 4 May 4, 201 to May 3, 2012, 549, 615, 769 2 E 2 E from May 4, 2011 to May 3, 3, 2011, from May 4, 2011 to May 3, 4, 2013 to May 4, 4, 2011, from May 824, 201 to May 3, 3, 2014, from May 4, 2014 to May 4, 412, 2011 to May 3, 3, 2016.

C. On May 2, 2011, the apartment of this case, which occurred a defect, was inspected on May 2, 201, and the construction of the apartment of this case did not construct the part to be constructed according to the design drawing while constructing the apartment of this case, or the construction of the apartment of this case did not construct the apartment of this case, or caused defects such as rupture, water leakage, etc. to the section

The Plaintiff is the Defendant.

arrow