logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.07.22 2019가단204825
운송대금청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s 64,359 US dollars to the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from February 7, 2019 to July 22, 2020.

Reasons

1. Progress of this case

A. The plaintiff is residing in the U.S. and operates a business entity called "C", and the defendant is operating the sea and air transport brokerage business.

Around April 2018, the Defendant received a proposal to participate in the tendering procedure on the contract for the carriage (hereinafter “the instant carriage”) of the electric steel board (hereinafter “the instant C”), which is intended to export from D (hereinafter “D”) to the United States, from California, to Allala E E (F; hereinafter “F”).

B. On April 11, 2018, the Plaintiff sent e-mail to the Plaintiff requesting the estimation of the instant transport (Provided, That the time and time of each day are sent by e-mail sent to Korea and the U.S.). The condition was “the truck transport accompanied by the 656 Coil (Wil No. 2,733 tons), 120 expected container, 22 tons per weight of the container, and 32 tons of the weight of the container at the warehouse after unloading the amount of LA port,” and the bid closing time.

4. 11.0.0.00.00.0.00.00.00.00.

On April 12, 2018, according to the above conditions, the Defendant proposed a transportation method premised on the Plaintiff’s payment of USD 1,300 per container with the limit of 22 tones per 1,300 per container, by extending the free storage period without additional storage fees (free) to 20 days, not ordinary 5 days, because it is difficult to mobilize majority trucks in the indoor warehouse in the LA port because it is difficult to mobilize many trucks.

From that time to April 17, 2018, when transporting a truck with a lawful transport weight in the LA area exceeds 20 tons, various transport methods were proposed to reduce the unit cost of transport due to additional costs incurred from the transportation in the warehouse, which is a lawful transport weight in the LA area, after loading and unloading containers.

In addition, on April 18, 2018, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant on April 18, 2018, when the weight of the co-days of this case can be 1061 to 6,077 tons, the container shall be moved to the warehouse.

arrow