1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion and the Defendant agreed to work together at the C Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, and that real estate brokerage fees should be divided by 50%.

The plaintiff and the defendant acted as a broker with respect to the D. D. D. 556.9m2 and its ground buildings in Seosan-si.

Since the defendant received KRW 40 million from the brokerage commission, it is obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 20 million, which is 50% per annum.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of evidence evidence Nos. 7, 8, and 9 and the entire argument, the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s service at the real estate agent’s office from around 2017 to July 2018 can be recognized.

However, even if all the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff is compiled, it is insufficient to recognize the existence of an agreement to distribute 50% of the Defendant’s revenue of brokerage commission to the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff's above assertion cannot be accepted.

3. The Plaintiff’s claim for conclusion ought to be dismissed due to the lack of reasonable grounds.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.