logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.12.10 2014나2026048
압류채권 지급청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows, except for adding or adding the decision to be seen in Paragraph 2, and are the same as the part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

From the third ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "431,05-036754" was "431-05-03675" and the fourth 6-7 of the fourth 6-7 of the fourth 7, "571,369,706 out of the seizure amount related to the name forest Construction Co., Ltd. is concurrently seized," and "the head of the Seocho District Office deleted the claims of 571,369,706 out of the seizure amount related to the name forest Construction Co., Ltd. and the collection order and the seizure of the claims by the head of Seocho Tax Office (the head of the Seocho District Tax Office seized the claims of 2,222,745,200 won added the additional tax to 2,289,427,570 won)" and "the claims of 57,69,760-14,700 won".

Part 6.12. Pursuant to paragraph 12, the following shall be added:

According to the evidence Nos. 3, 24, and 2 of the evidence Nos. 2, the defendant is in charge of construction as "net contractor" (Article 3(2) of the terms of the contract of the construction contract of this case), as well as the obligation of loans for the project costs of e.g. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.S.s. and E.S.s.s. S.S.s. S. S.S. S. S. S. S. S.S. S.S. S. S. S.S.s.S.s. and E.S.s.S.s. S.S. S. S. S. S. S. S.S. S. S.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.s

arrow