beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2015 Highest918" means that the Defendant received a large amount of money from a customer who visited the said attorney-at-law office by means of real estate successful bid against the customer who visited the said attorney-at-law office, on the basis that the Defendant had worked as an "office leader" at the law office E-law office located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.
1. On October 2013, the criminal defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F in Ulsan-gu G H division located in Ulsan-gu G G, Ulsan-gu, stating that "I would allow the victim F to make a large amount of profits by winning an auction at the court where the auction goods are sold at the court due to their friendship with the court employees in the Republic of Korea. At the same time, in Ulsan-si, one studio-dong, which is located behind the JN club located in the Nam-gu I, Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., has been put into a good auction goods, and three persons, such as the lawyer, Ksung-type, the president, and the defendant, etc., already participate in this case, so I would like to make the most profits by winning the auction."
However, the above studio building does not have any intention or ability to guarantee a large profit by winning the above studio in an auction or by attorney-at-law or the president, etc., and even if the defendant received an investment from the victim, he did not intend to use the investment fund voluntarily.
On October 23, 2013, the Defendant, at the same time, received money from the victim in total of KRW 22,5320,000,000,000 from the Defendant’s community credit cooperative account as the price for the above studio successful bid, and received money from the victim in total of KRW 14,30,000,000 from the Defendant’s community credit cooperative account, KRW 7,000,000 around the 24th of the same month, and KRW 532,00,00
2. Around November 11, 2013, the Defendant against the Victim L, the victim of the instant legal office (hereinafter “EN”) was aware of the Victim L (hereinafter “EN”)’s personal incompetence near the said legal office (hereinafter “EN”) with the knowledge of his or her attorney-at-law and his or her employees at the court auction and the court auction, and there are many customers who requested ENN to bid for auction.