Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:50 on July 3, 2013, the Defendants: (a) received a report from the husband and wife; (b) “A victim E, a police officer affiliated with D Zone D District of the Busan, 1,000 U.S. Police Station, who called to the same place, was fighting with the victim’s face and left part of the victim’s body.” (c) the Defendants attempted to kill the victim’s body by drinking together with the bath theory, such as “a breath, fright, etc., to breath; and (d) the victim’s body was salpted with 3 weeks old-si, Seocheon-gu, 2013, and the victim’s body was salpted, and the victim’s body was salpted by assaulting the victim’s body to the left part of the victim’s body for treatment; and (d) the victim’s body was salpted with the victim’s 2 outside part of the body.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the mobilization of police officers E- 112 report and arrest of flagrant offenders, and Defendant A inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to injury diagnosis certificates and photographs;

1. Articles 136(1), 30 ( point of obstruction of performance of official duties against the defendants), and 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (a point of harm to the defendants A);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the commercial concurrence (defendant A);

1. Each selective fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the instant orders for provisional payment, is committed by assaulting a police officer who performs legitimate duties, obstructing the performance of his duties, and causing an injury to a police officer, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, the Defendants are themselves.