logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.11.23 2018고단3635
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 3635, hereinafter “33635”) Victim D(30) is between “E” insurance designer, and the Defendant’s workplace platform, and the Defendant is operating a high-class restaurant in the marine transport vehicle to the ordinary victim D.

It has been said that.

On May 29, 2015, the Defendant lent KRW 5 million to the victim D at the office of "E" of the 4th floor of the F building in Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan around May 29, 2015, the Defendant would give KRW 5,100,000 to the victim D, even though he did not have any money, he would lend KRW 5,00,000,000,000 to 1,000,000,000,000 to 1,000,000.

Then, the purport of “a loan of 5 million won” was to the effect that it was “.”.

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant did not operate a high-speed restaurant in the marine transport vehicle, borrowed money from the victim D to lend money to another person, and even if the principal, interest, etc. were recovered, the Defendant was merely intended to use the Defendant’s existing debt repayment or living expenses, etc., and did not have an intention to change it to the victim D. Even if such intent did not exist, the Defendant did not have the ability to pay the amount of 39 million won in the absence of any particular property.

As above, on May 29, 2015, the Defendant, as well as the receipt of KRW 5 million from the victim D to the H bank account (I) designated by the Defendant on May 29, 2015, by deceiving the victim D, received KRW 18,26,888 in total over four times from around that time to the end of November 2015, as described in the crime sight table.

[2] The Defendant (one person “B”) who is a non-registered credit service provider (hereinafter “3777”) is a non-registered credit service provider (one person “B”) and was unable to receive the loan amount from the JJ, in collusion with K, J, loan applicants, etc., and the J’s husband L is deemed to have leased L’s husband L’s L’s L’s house to the applicant for the loan, and the financial institution received the loan as a full-time loan from the financial institution.

arrow