All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (Defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and fine for 1.5 million won for Defendant C) is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence against Defendant A of the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. It is desirable to refrain from rendering a sentence that does not change the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect them. Although the sentence of the first instance court falls within the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to refrain from rendering a sentence that does not vary with the first instance court on the sole ground that the difference between the opinion of the appellate court and the opinion of the appellate court is somewhat different (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In light of the foregoing legal principles, in light of the foregoing, the court did not submit new data on sentencing, and there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the first instance court, and even if all the grounds for sentencing specified in the instant argument are comprehensive, it is not recognized that the first instance sentencing is too heavy or it goes beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. 결론 그렇다면 피고인들과 검사의 항소는 이유 없으므로 형사 소송법 제 364조 제 4 항에 따라 이를 모두 기각하기로 하여 주문과 같이 판결한다[ 다만 형사소송규칙 제 25조 제 1 항에 따라 직권으로 원심판결 범죄 사 실란 제 3 면 제 10 행의 “ 지분비율마저 합의 되지 ”를 “ 지분비율마저 합의되지” 로, 제 4 면 제 2 행의 “ 등을 매도하기로 ”를 “ 등을 매도하기로” 로, 제 5 면 제 6 행의 “O 이 ”를 “ ㈜Q 이” 로 각 고치고, 원심판결 증거의 요 지란에 “ 증 제 50호( 기계설비 양도 양수서) ”를 추가하는 것으로 경정한다].