The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On January 13, 2015, around 04:40 on January 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault by the victim’s husband E in front of the Seoul Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Victim C victim’s residence; (b) during the victim’s husband E in a noise issue, the victim she gets off with E and Si expenses, following the victim’s disturbance; (c) the victim was fluencing her head debt; and (d) the victim was flucing her head debt with both hands.

2. Determination

A. In order to establish a false defense of a political party, the act of defense shall be socially reasonable, taking into account all specific circumstances, such as the type, degree, method of infringement, completion of infringement, and the type and degree of legal interest to be infringed by the act of defense. The act of defense as a requirement for the establishment of a political party defense shall include not only pure passive defense, but also anti-defense types, including active anti-defense, to the extent that there is considerable reason (see Supreme Court Decisions 2007Do9863, Feb. 28, 2008; 92Do2540, Dec. 22, 1992). Further, the act of defense, which is determined under Article 20 of the Criminal Act, constitutes an act of attacking 20,000, and thus, constitutes an act of attacking 15,000,000 won and 20,0000,000 won, and thus, constitutes an act of attack or defense other than social ethics or interests.