The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendants (the three years of imprisonment, the five years of suspended execution, the community service, the 80 hours of imprisonment, the two years of suspended execution, the four years of suspended execution, the community service, the 80 hours of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The defendants recognized all of the crimes of this case in this court when they reached the court, and the defendant A agreed with the victims in the court below, and the fact that the defendant B agreed with the victims I is favorable to the defendants.

However, the circumstances favorable to the sentencing asserted by the Defendants in this Court are deemed to have been sufficiently considered in the original court’s determination of the punishment, and the sentencing of the lower court, based on this, exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It is also difficult to see it.

Therefore, the defendants' argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals by the Defendants are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.