Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and imprisonment with prison labor for a period of eight months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant A] around September 201, the Defendant received money from Defendant A, by threatening to see the weak points of interest or people with social confidence in the process of subcontracting construction work, which takes place at the construction site, in the form of a crypted work, to the effect that he/she had been working as a member of the society of the F Newspapers.

1. The defendant's sole criminal conduct;

A. On February 2012, 2012, the Defendant introduced his status to the victim G who emitted from a nearby a bus terminal located in the south-gu bus terminal located in the south-gu, Mando, and presented the same attitude to the effect that “the Defendant would not engage in drinking and sexual traffic,” and that “the Defendant would not engage in drinking and sexual traffic.” The Defendant, upon receiving 4 million won from the victim’s office located in the south-gu, in the temporary border, in two times from the victim’s office located in the south-gu, the Defendant took it over twice.

B. On February 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim J of the vehicle in Ecoos car parked in the vicinity of the north-gu I at the end of the port; (b) “Is the money that the Party was removed from the staff in charge of K construction and used in the same way as the money was divided; and (c) threatened the victim as if the victim’s weak points were at issue; (d) 3 million won was received from the victim who was frighted, and frighted it.

2. The Defendant, in collusion with LA, who was a construction hub with which LA had been aware of the general public, conspired with LA to gather news articles on the pretext of gathering news articles if he wants to transfer information about corruption or medicine points of society. However, the Defendant was willing to attract money and valuables by deceiving LA, who did not know about the pertinent misconduct, and by threatening LA to criticize it if he did not know about the pertinent misconduct.

In order to reduce construction costs, the Defendant committed a crime against the K Construction’s employees, which was subcontracted with the construction of the K Construction and subcontracted to the K Construction and provided to the head of the K Construction’s site office, etc.