logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.01.26 2015고정555
일반교통방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 3, 2015, the Defendant, while driving a E-si from D located in the front of the city of Won-si around 22:20 on October 3, 2015, was driving the E-si on the front of the D-si.

F Driving Gambling, and the F is driving by the Defendant.

E-si requested to turn on the right side of E-si.

When F requires her concession as above, the Defendant:

E Around 30 minutes of a vehicle which was trying to pass through the above G taxi by means of stopping close to the above G taxi, thereby allowing other vehicles to pass through the above 30 minutes of the vehicle, which are the head of the public for the traffic.

(F) The Defendant argues that it is unfair to hold the Defendant liable for interference with general traffic on the ground that the F driver’s taxi is going beyond the median line first, and the Defendant’s vehicle faces each other while proceeding in one’s lane, and the FF’s vehicle was in a space where the Defendant’s vehicle might pass through the vehicle at that time, but the F left the vehicle with the driver’s vehicle at that time.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the following evidence, i.e., (i) a wooden H, at the time of the instant case, was a police officer, in which the F’s vehicle was unable to be obstructed by the Defendant’s vehicle, whereas the Defendant’s vehicle was in the yieldable condition.

(2) that the vehicle has ceased on one’s own lane;

Even if a vehicle becomes unable to pass through, it can be deemed an act of interference with traffic, and ③ even if taking photographs of the site at the time of the instant case, the Defendant’s vehicle stops on the road while the road is parked, and both end of the road shows that there was no space for damage caused to the vehicle, the Defendant is recognized to interfere with the general traffic.

Therefore, we cannot accept this part of the defendant's assertion.

arrow