The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (eight months of imprisonment).

2. The judgment states that even though the defendant's mistake is recognized, the defendant's mother is living in depth, support the Chinese house delivery unit, and the defendant's obstruction of the performance of official duties is a crime that undermines the function of the State by nullifyinging legitimate exercise of public authority, and that the defendant's business owner of "Ecafeteria", the victim of the obstruction of the performance of duties, and his employee expressed that he does not want the defendant's punishment. However, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being informed of the suspension of execution of official duties, suspension of the execution of imprisonment, fine, and one month after the sentence of the suspension of the execution of the above imprisonment was sentenced, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being informed of the fact that the defendant's obstruction of the performance of official duties is a crime that undermines the function of the State, and that there is a need to strictly punish it, and that the defendant's act of this case's obstruction of the performance of official duties is deemed to have committed each of the crimes of this case, circumstances before and after the crime, occupation, age, and circumstances, etc.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.