logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.11.26 2013고단3667
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

One piece of paper (No. 4) seized shall be confiscated.

A certificate of seized tools.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 16, 2013, the Defendant purchased tobacco at the “E” convenience store operated by the victim under the name in Dongbcheon-si, Dongbcheon-si, with the credit card in the name of C, and presented the completion of the card as if he was the Defendant’s credit card, and acquired by receiving one tobacco amounting to KRW 2,500 from the victim, and acquired by defrauding KRW 510,50 from the victims as shown in the attached list 1 of crimes committed.

2. Around 14:00 on September 25, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim H (the age of 48) and Nowhum in front of the precious metal store located in F in Dongducheoncheon-si, with a flick-si problem. B, while having been in dispute, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the side, which is a dangerous object carried by the Defendant.

3. Around 10:50 on September 28, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim K (the age of 45) in J Hospital 1001 room located in Jacheon-si I, Jacheon-si, on the ground that the victim K (the age of 45) fats her body and fats her body, which led to a brucing of the victim’s brus by hand, and that the Defendant

4. Around 06:00 on September 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) obtained a letter of gallony lusium near a public parking lot located in 720,00 Dongdu-si (hereinafter referred to as “public parking lot”); (b) but (c) did not take necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim, and (d) did not take any necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim, at a waste storage facility near the public parking lot located in 720,00 Dongdu-si.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

5. On October 5, 2013, the Defendant violated the Fraud and the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act by using M’s credit card in the name of M presents presents that the No.C. card in the name of M obtained as if it were the Defendant’s credit card.

arrow