logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.11.21 2014고정431
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment for the crime of indecent act by compulsion at the office of the Gwangju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 14, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

From December 5, 2013, the Defendant is a person who sells 4-person tables in the area of 30 square meters with the trade name “D” from the net City C from December 5, 2013.

No one shall make a false indication of origin or make an indication that may cause confusion as to the origin of agricultural and fishery products pursuant to the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products.

Nevertheless, from December 16, 2013 to February 17, 2014, the Defendant purchased KRW 23,500 in total, KRW 282,00 in the 10kg of Chinese Chinese Chinese red-ciring 120km (10kg/g, 12 gpam) in the Republic of Korea from F managing E three times from around December 16, 2013 to around February 17, 2014, and sold KRW 104.3 g of this among this, with the origin of the red-cloiring g used in the Chinese red-cloiring Kim as "domestic acid", and kept KRW 15.7 gg of the Kimchi-g in the Republic of Korea, among domestic businesses, to sell it by the same way.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Report on the offender's domicile;

1. On-site photographs (D);

1. Previous Records: The Defendant, at the time of the first transaction with the F and the F, ordered kimchi, which is a domestic product. The F supplied kimchi, which is a Korean product, indicated the origin of kimchi in the specifications of the transaction, as “domestic”. Since the Defendant trusted this and did not know of the Chinese Chinese product, he asserts to the effect that the Defendant did not have any intention to make a false indication of origin.

According to the above evidence, the witness F appeared as a witness in this court, and when the defendant first trades with the defendant, it is accurate about the price of kimchi in Korea and kimchi in Korea.

arrow