logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.12.19 2014가합6963
건물명도
Text

1.(a)

Defendant A delivers to Defendant B the real estate listed in the separate sheet to Defendant B’s House;

B. Defendant B.

Reasons

1.(a)

The following facts do not conflict between the Plaintiff and Defendant B, and vice versa (hereinafter “Defendant Non-permanent Housing”), and Defendant A may be acknowledged by considering the overall purport of the pleadings in the evidence Nos. 1 through 5.

1) On July 31, 2010, Defendant A’s real estate indicated in the separate sheet from the apartment house annexed to Defendant Young-gu Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

1) determine the deposit amount of KRW 160,00,000, advance payment rent of KRW 20,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 509,300, not set the period.

) Lease (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) is deemed to be the case.

(2) On October 22, 2010, the Plaintiff: (a) transferred to Defendant A a loan of KRW 153,00,000 per annum; (b) KRW 5.5% per annum; (c) KRW 22% per annum; and (d) November 1, 2011 at maturity; and (b) Defendant A, as security for the said loan, transferred to the Plaintiff the claim for refund of KRW 180,000,000 ( KRW 160,000,000,000) and notified the Plaintiff of the claim for refund of KRW 20,00,000 per annum.

3) On June 17, 2011, Defendant A subleted the instant apartment without Defendant B’s consent. 4) Defendant A failed to repay the principal of the said loan, and Defendant A did not pay interest and delay damages therefrom from March 15, 2014.

B. On November 26, 2014, the instant complaint states that the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease contract on the ground of the said sub-lease in subrogation of the Plaintiff’s right to request the return, such as the deposit, etc., and the duplicate of the said complaint reached Defendant A on November 26, 2014.

2. According to the above facts, since the lease of this case was terminated on or around November 26, 2014, Defendant A transferred the apartment of this case to Defendant B, Defendant B removed the apartment of this case from the apartment of this case, and Defendant B left the apartment of this case, and the apartment of this case was overdue at KRW 180,000 to the Plaintiff at the same time with Defendant A’s delivery of the apartment of this case.

arrow