A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:10 on May 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) while making a drinking to a customer on the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D and 1st underground floor, the Defendant: (b) 1, the police officer of the Incheon Southern Police Station H District, who was a police officer of the said EM, who reported and sent the 112 report, tried to verify the details of the report against the said G; and (c) 1, the Defendant added the said I, “I would like to say, “I would have to go out in the Ne four areas, and you would have to go back to drink, I would like to write down this wh h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement to I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the F Statements;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] Where the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is insignificant in the area of mitigation [Special Mitigation] (one to eight months] of the area of obstruction of performance of official duties (special mitigation] [Determination of sentence], although the year 2013 has served as a fine of 50,00 won for the same kind of crime, the fact that the crime is divided from the stage of investigation, and that the damaged police and the deceptive agreement are reached smoothly, etc.