Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 21:00 on June 13, 2014, had a knife with the victim F (38 years of age) who is her husband at the Defendant’s house located in Haanan-gun Einananan-gun, Haan-gun on 208, and had a knife with the victim F (38 years of age) who was her husband, and had a knife with the knife (30cm in total length, 20cm in knife) which was dangerous in the kitchen, and knife the victim’s face.

The term "the victim was threatened" and the victim was threatened.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on recording;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The victim was shouldered because the victim did not drink and work at the time of the statement on the facts constituting the crime, but the victim was faced with the victim's child, and the victim was knife with the victim in order to inform the defendant of the fact that he was flick, but the victim was flicked again without reaction of play, and the defendant did not have the same words as the facts constituting the crime.

Therefore, the defendant's act does not constitute a threat of harm and injury in intimidation.

2. The following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, the Defendant stated that there is no difference in the fact that the Defendant was a knife at an investigative agency, but according to the record of recording, G was not able to kill the Defendant in the course of dialogue with Defendant G, which means that G would not have a knife the Defendant.

Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma., or in the course of conversation with Defendant Ma. Ma. Ka

1.1 Does this sound, if any, i.e., n.;

The knife will naturally be knife.