logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2018.04.05 2018고단35
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. On December 16, 1994, around 16:09, the Defendant, an employee of the Defendant, loaded and operated a log of 44.49 tons of KRW 44.49 tons on B truck at the street in front of the Jung-gu Incheon central inspection station, Jung-gu, Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, in order to commit an offense against the Defendant’s duties by violating the vehicle operation restriction (total weight of 40 tons) by the road management agency.

2. The former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) which is a legal provision applicable to the facts charged in this case, where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article.

“The part “” was retroactively invalidated in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality (Supreme Court Order 201Hun-Ga24 Dated December 29, 201).

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, it is so decided as per Disposition by deciding not guilty pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and by publicly announcing the summary of this judgment pursuant to the main sentence of Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow