The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for twenty-six years.

One set (No. 5) of the strings (No. 5) seized shall be confiscated.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (22 years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant, while making a confession to commit the instant crime, is against the Defendant.

There is no history that the defendant has been punished in excess of a fine.

However, when the Defendant was urged from the injured party to move the name of dump truck and the franchiseer vehicle purchased in the name of the Defendant, the Defendant took an opportunity to kill the injured party in order to capture it, and took the opportunity to kill the injured party on the day of the crime of this case where the injured party was under the influence of alcohol at the time of drinking together with the injured party, and strokeed the injured party’s stroke by using strings as already planned intention, and abandoned the injured party’s body into the river by carrying the body of the injured party’s body into the vehicle and scokeing him/her into the body.

As above, not only was the crime that was closely planned, but also the crime that was committed by the defendant, i.e., the victim who is well aware of the economic situation of the defendant, committed the act of disregarding the defendant by borrowing the name of the vehicle, and therefore, it is difficult to understand at all as an accident method of the general public, and the method of committing the crime is very poor.

After committing the crime, the Defendant told the victim’s bereaved family members to the effect that “to help the victim find a victim,” and thereafter, calls from the victim at a harsh time.

Military service providers sent S message with the content of “nicking about the food tools.”

This behavior shown by the defendant after the crime is likely to be criticized as the minimum conscience or Dolma that should have as human beings.

The fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case at an investigative agency is recognized.