logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2015.11.13 2013가합5621
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties shall pay each corresponding money from the Plaintiff as indicated in the “sale Price” column of the attached Table.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the Housing Reconstruction and Improvement Project Association established to implement the Housing Reconstruction Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant project”) in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the Plaintiff is the owner of each of the relevant real estate listed in the separate sheet located in the instant project area (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

B. On June 20, 2013 and July 15, 2013, the Plaintiff sent a written peremptory notice to the effect that, within two months, whether the Plaintiff consented to the establishment of the Plaintiff’s association pursuant to Article 39 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) and Article 48 of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “Aggregate Buildings Act”), the Plaintiff sent a written peremptory notice to the effect that, however, the Defendant (Appointed Party) did not reply within two months after receiving the written peremptory notice.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff exercised the right to claim the sale of each of the instant real estate by serving a duplicate of the instant complaint on the Defendant (Appointed Party). The duplicate of the instant complaint was served on each of the Defendant (Appointed Party) on the corresponding date indicated in the “Date of Trade” column in the attached Table.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 3, and 4 evidence 1 to 11, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion has a claim to sell each of the real estate of this case located within the project area of this case pursuant to Article 39 of the Urban Improvement Act and Article 48 of the Aggregate Buildings Act against the defendant (appointed party) who did not consent to establish the association. The plaintiff shall exercise the right to sell by delivery of

Therefore, the defendant (appointed party) falls under each of the above items in the appraisal value of each real estate stated in the "real estate" column in the attached Table from the plaintiff.

arrow