The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and B are married couple on December 3, 1984, and they are living separately from around 2004.

On April 1, 2009, the Defendant entered “B” and “B” in the column of the subscription date for “Family Love Insurance Co., Ltd.” in the “Contractor column” and “B” in the Jeju Insured column and entered “B” in the signature column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one insurance subscription form in the name of B, a private document on rights and obligations, and, in other words, submitted a forged insurance subscription form to the employees of an insurance company who are aware of the forgery at the seat, and exercised it.

From that time until August 5, 2014, the Defendant forged and exercised eight copies, such as an insurance subscription form, insurance claim form, and insurance claim form in the name of B in the same manner, as shown in the attached list of crimes, from that time until August 5, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. A copy of a forged document;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Articles 231 and 234 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 231 and 234 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59 (1) of the Suspension of Sentence (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 200Do1448, Apr. 1, 2001);