1. As to 1/1002.2/100 of the Daegu Jung-gu Lane 3313 square meters,

A. Defendant J and K are Defendant G, H and I on June 15, 1978.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 5, 1976, Sig M purchased one-half share of 1002.2/100 of 3313 square meters from Daegu-gu Lbae-gu, Daegu-gu (hereinafter “instant land share”) and one-half share of 3313 square meters (hereinafter “instant store”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer for the instant land share and the instant store on the same day.

B. As to the store of this case, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on June 17, 1978 between the deceased M and the deceased P on the ground of the sale on June 15, 1978. ② The registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of the inheritance on May 15, 1982 between the defendant G, Q, I, and I, the heir of the deceased P on May 12, 1986. ③ The registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of the sale on June 16, 1986 between the defendant G, Q, I and the deceased R on June 16, 198; ④ the registration of ownership transfer was made on April 12, 1994 on the ground of the sale on the part of the deceased on April 16, 199; ④ the registration of ownership transfer was made on the ground of the plaintiff C, D, F, E, F, 10 on May 16, 1994; ⑤ the registration of ownership transfer between the plaintiff on the inheritance.

C. The instant land share remains in the future of the deceased M as of the date of the closing of the argument in this case, and Defendant J and K are the deceased M’s successors.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the section for exclusive use and the right to use site is in unity with that of the sectional owner of the aggregate building, and the former owners of the instant store disposed of the right to use site along with the ownership of the section for exclusive use, and the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the instant store, thereby acquiring the right to use site.

B. Defendant G, H, and I’s assertion that Defendant G, H, and I sold to the network R as the network P, the decedent of the said Defendants, was purchased from the network M, and only the instant store was subject to the sale.