1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The facts subsequent to the facts are either in dispute between the parties or in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 6, and 8 (including paper numbers). It can be acknowledged that the whole purport of the pleadings was neglected.

The Plaintiff, from November 2003 to June 2006, worked as the head office of the Korea Daz (hereinafter “Korea Daz”) in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, as the head office B, and retired on May 30, 2008.

B. Around January 2009, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the effect that “Around December 2003, the Plaintiff was ordered to all the disposal of U.S. beef stored in the store in the U.S., while the Plaintiff was stored in the store in the large meat processing, but distributed them as normal beef around 2005.”

C. Around December 2003, Korea Daz Management announced that it will not sell U.S. beef products (such as cattle and dubs, spine, ebrates, internal organs, etc.) but U.S. LA to the extent of promoting the image of Matept, and decided to collect and dispose of the stocks of U.S. beef in the store as a subsequent measure. The Plaintiff, a working-level officer, returned the stocks to D (hereinafter “D”) instead of disposing of the inventory, and then distributed some products, such as LAB, etc. among them.

D is a company operated by the plaintiff's wife E. D.

On February 10, 2009, the prosecutor executed a warrant of search and seizure against the plaintiff on suspicion of violating the Processing of Livestock Products Act, and applied for detention warrant against the plaintiff.