beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel No. 415 is a person who operates an officetel entertainment business in the trade name of “C”.
From August 16, 2015 to September 16, 2015, the Defendant advertised commercial sex acts with the trade name of “C” on the said officetel’s Internet entertainment site between around August 16, 2015 and around September 16, 2015, and had male customers who reported and contacted the advertisement receive KRW 100,000 won for commercial sex acts from the male customers, and let female employees D, etc. do similar acts to see the gender of male customers, thereby engaging in commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts.
The Defendant of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 503 is a person who operates a business of sexual traffic in the name of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 503.
On September 11, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 100,00 from a male who is unable to know his name at the above sexual traffic business establishment on September 11, 2015, and arranged for a similar sexual intercourse with F, which is a female sexual traffic, as mentioned above, from September 4, 2015 to September 11, 2015.
Summary of Evidence
"2016 High 265"
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G or D;
1. Photographs of a sexual traffic business establishment, 2016 Gaz. 460;
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;
1. Application of statutes on field photographs;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic.
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;