logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.05 2016가단33062
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. The defendant is simultaneously with the delivery of Nos. 1 (a) of No. 516 of the fifth floor of the building C in the time of harmony from the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On November 16, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant by setting the term “1 of subparagraph 516 (a) of subparagraph 5 of the fifth floor of the building Dalsung City” as the lease deposit amount of KRW 22,00,000,000, and the term of lease from November 16, 2012 to November 15, 2013.

B. While the above lease contract was implicitly renewed at the expiration of the term, and the Plaintiff was using the leased object pursuant to ombudsman, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of his/her no intent to renew the contract after November 15, 2015 by content-certified mail.

C. Nevertheless, since the Defendant did not refund the above lease deposit to the Plaintiff, the Defendant sought to refund the said lease deposit to the Plaintiff with the delivery of the above lease object from the Plaintiff simultaneously.

2. Judgment on deemed confessions of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow