The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On February 11, 2008, the Defendant established E with D and Dong businesses, and invested all expenses such as expenses for the establishment of the above company, and the Defendant agreed with D to take charge of the actual operation of the above company.

3. 8. The Internet shopping mall, a computer Internet shopping mall, purchased all rights such as domain name rights, shopping mall rights, software rights, trademark rights, etc. from the above F representative G for KRW 200 million.

The defendant and the above D had a duty to manage and operate the above F and not to arbitrarily dispose of the rights to the above F with the intent to manage and operate the F so that the maximum profit to the victim would be generated and the debt would have been continuously increased, and on March 20, 2010, the defendant and the above D had a duty not to manage and operate the F and to arbitrarily dispose of the rights to the F with respect to the F, including all rights to the F, to I, a victim H management corporation of the victim H.

On March 4, 2014, the Defendant transferred the above F domain name rights, software registered copyrights, rights to ownership servers, trademark rights, patent rights, etc. to J, the creditor-based creditor, to acquire pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 100 million and suffered pecuniary damages equivalent to the above amount, subject to set-off against the existing obligation of KRW 100 million.

2. The summary of the defendant's defense is that the defendant's duty not to dispose of the domain name of this case on the other hand, since the domain name, software registration copyright, ownership server right, trademark right, patent right, etc. transferred to J is not the right of the defendant as the defendant's right to possess and operate the victim H.

shall not be deemed to exist.

Therefore, the Defendant transferred the patent right, etc. of this case to J

Even if the crime of breach of trust is not established against the victim.

3...