The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the spouse of the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”).

On December 4, 2014, the deceased joined Non-Party C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Non-Party C”) and worked as the chief of the Development Team from March 24, 2015.

B. At around 09:00 on April 13, 2015, the Deceased discovered from her home to stop pulmon and beering and transferred to D Hospital, but was confirmed to be dead before the hospital arrive.

As a result of the autopsy on the deceased, the cause of death was presumed to be a acute funeral in connection with the heart fluorcing of the ornamental beer and the ornamental beeral beer.

C. On May 2, 2017, the Plaintiff claimed that the death of the deceased constitutes occupational accidents under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and that the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses were paid to the Defendant.

On September 12, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision on the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral allowance (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that “In view of the fact that there was no sudden and difficult occurrence or sudden change in the work environment related to the work within 24 hours prior to the occurrence of the network, the average work hours per week prior to the occurrence did not exceed 30% of the daily work hours, and the average work hours per week during four weeks prior to the occurrence did not meet the chronic criteria, the proximate causal relation between the work and the cause of death cannot be acknowledged” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

E. The Plaintiff appealed and filed a request for review following the procedure of the request for review, but was dismissed on December 13, 2018.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1, 2, Eul's 1 through 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the deceased died due to excessive work load, occupational stress, and uneasy due to wage delay while working in the non-party company, and thus constitutes occupational accident, the instant disposition on a different premise is unlawful.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

(c).