logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.09.03 2013가단32119
부당이득금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant C’s KRW 193,568 as well as 5% per annum from December 4, 2014 to September 3, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 11, 2013, the Plaintiff posted a phone call to the Plaintiff and reported it to the police. In so doing, the Plaintiff demanded to inform the Plaintiff of personal information, such as the Plaintiff’s security card number.

B. The Plaintiff was informed of the foregoing information to the person under whose name the Plaintiff was not given, and the person under whose name the Plaintiff was not given up KRW 6,580,000,000 to the agricultural bank account in the name of Defendant B, C, D, E, G, H, I, and J, respectively, from the agricultural bank account in the name of the Plaintiff and the national bank account in the name of the Plaintiff.

C. As above, most of the money transferred to each account under the name of the Defendants were withdrawn thereafter, and 193,568 won remains in Defendant C’s account, and 5,001,404 won out of the money deposited to Defendant J’s account was refunded to the Plaintiff.

[Ground of Recognition] Defendant D, G, I, and J: The respective statements in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 of the Confession Ma, C, E, F, and H: The purport of this Court’s order to submit each financial transaction information to the head of the NAFF Bank, the head of the NAF branch office of the NAFF Bank, the head of the NAF branch office of the NAFF, and the head of the NA

2. Claim against Defendant D, G, I, and J

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

c. Claim against Defendant B, C, E, F, and H

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) In the first place, the Defendants were obligated to return the money from the Plaintiff’s account under the name of the Defendants to the Plaintiff by remitting the money from the Plaintiff’s account to each of the financial accounts in the name of the Defendants, thereby gaining profits without any legal cause. 2) In the second place, the Plaintiff was subject to telephone financial fraud from the person under the name of the Defendants, and the Defendants were not able to use the money for the crime, and the Defendants were able to transfer their passbooks, check cards, cash cards to the person under the name of the Defendants and

arrow