beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
(a) Defendant I:754,580 won and, in respect thereof,
B. Defendant N shall be KRW 487,820 and as to this, C.
Reasons
1. Determination as to claims against Defendant I, N, X, andY
A. The Defendants indicated the claim are those who directly concluded a sales contract with the Plaintiff with respect to the Gyeongnam-dong Housing Site Development Zone 11B/L constructed by the Plaintiff around 2007, Young-gu, Young-gu, Youngdong, Young-gu, Seoul, and acquire the status of the buyer from those who directly concluded the sales contract.
According to the above sales contract, taxes and public charges incurred after the date of designation of occupancy as determined by the Plaintiff were assessed against the Defendants, and thereafter, the Plaintiff determined the date of designation of occupancy around March 30, 2009 as one month from April 30, 2009.
However, the above Defendants imposed property tax on June 1, 2009 as the tax base date for the Plaintiff’s apartment that the Plaintiff acquired in lots by Defendant I, paid property tax of KRW 754,580 on the apartment that the Plaintiff purchased in lots, KRW 487,820 on the apartment that Defendant X purchased in lots, KRW 698,280 on the apartment that Defendant X purchased in lots, and KRW 710,820 on the apartment that Defendant X purchased in lots.
(b) Defendant I, based on recognition, is a judgment by service by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act). Defendant N, X, andY: A judgment by deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure
2. The judgment as to the claim against the defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, K, L, M, M, P, Q, Q, R, S, T, U,V, W, and Z (hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as "the above defendants"), covering the above defendants
A. Basic facts (1) The Plaintiff was a company that constructed and sold an apartment building in Yong-gu, Yong-dong Housing Site Development Zone 11B/L in Young-dong, Young-gu, Young-gu, 2007. The Defendants directly concluded the sales contract on the above apartment or acquired the status of the buyer from those who directly concluded the sales contract in 2007.
(hereinafter) The contract with the Plaintiff, which became the basis for the seller of the above apartment, is (2).